The Execution of Admiral Byng

“Any court-martial is a perilous thing, whether you are in the right or the wrong – justice has nothing much to do with it. Remember poor Vincent of the Weymouth: remember Byng – shot for an error of judgment and for being unpopular with the mob. – Captain Ferris to Jack Aubrey, Master and Commander

Every Person in the Fleet, who through Cowardice, Negligence, or Disaffection, shall in Time of Action withdraw or keep, or not come into the Fight or Engagement, or shall not to do his utmost to take or destroy every Ship which it shall be his Duty to engage, and to assist and relieve all and every of his Majesty’s Ships, or those of his Allies, which it shall be his Duty to assist and relieve, every such Person so offending, and being convicted thereof the Sentence of a Court-martial, shall suffer Death. – British Articles of War (1749)

On March 14, 1757, English Admiral John Byng was shot to death by musketry on the quarterdeck of his own ship, the HMS Monarque, for failing to “do his utmost” to defend Minorca against the French.

The first and last man of that rank executed by the Royal Navy, Byng was one of 15 (!) children of an ennobled admiral. He’d been 40 years at sea himself, a competent, forgettable senior officer unburdened by genius.

The 1750s found him in service of a listless British Empire sliding towards war with France. London had her eye mostly on the North American conflict already underway … but that conflagration was about to jump the pond.

In 1756, the Brits belatedly realized the French were about to grab the Mediterranean island/naval base of Minorca (Menorca) from them, and dispatched a too-little, too-late expedition under Admiral Byng.

By the time he got there, the French already had Minorca in hand, save the last, besieged garrison. Byng attempted to land reinforcements for the garrison — without enthusiasm, since he perceived the inadequacy of his force — and was repelled in an inconclusive naval engagement.

The loss of Minorca raised the curtain on the Seven Years War: the first “world war,” in Winston Churchill’s reckoning, in which European alliances would duke it out for continent and colonies.

But it dropped the curtain on the ill-starred Admiral Byng.

Popular outrage at the military setback had the Duke of Newcastle’s government scrambling to find a scapegoat, and the commander on the scene fit the bill exactly.

A gloating French account of the engagement — “the English had the advantage of the wind, but still seemed unwilling to fight” — reached Albion’s shores ahead of the admiral’s dispatch; when the latter arrived, it was publicly leaked in unflatteringly redacted form that generally made Byng look like a big fraidy-cat.

Having been thus attainted in the court of public opinion, the admiral was hailed before a court martial and convicted of not doing enough to relieve the English garrison and generally not fighting a very good fight.

Only one penalty was prescribed for this offense: death.

“The officers who composed this tribunal” themselves had such misgivings about shooting an officer for an on-the-scene tactical miscalculation “unanimously subscribed a letter to the board of admiralty [reading] ‘for our own consciences sake, as well as in justice to the prisoner, we pray your lordships, in the most earnest manner, to recommend him to his majesty’s clemency.'”

But Hanoverian George II had no upside in getting involved. He faced complaints enough wringing the revenue out of Englanders to defend a hereditary German electorate of no consequence to British security; what sense could there be in antagonizing the irritated masses by going to bat for the official fall guy in the realm’s scandalous military reversal?

On the day fixed for his execution the boats belonging to the squadron at Spithead being manned and armed, containing their captains and officers, with a detachment of marines, attended this solemnity in the harbour, which was also crowded with an infinite number of other boats and vessels filled with spectators. About noon, the Admiral having taken leave of a clergyman, and two friends who accompanied him, walked out of the great cabin to the quarter-deck, where two files of marines were ready to execute the sentence.

He advanced with a firm deliberate step, a composed and resolute countenance, and resolved to suffer with his face uncovered, until his friends, representing that his looks would possibly intimidate the soldiers, and prevent their taking aim properly, he submitted to their request, threw his hat on the deck, kneeled on a cushion, tied one white handkerchief over his eyes, and dropped the other as a signal for his executioners, who fired a volley so decisive, that five balls passed through his body, and he dropped down dead in an instant. The time in which this tragedy was acted, from his walking out of the cabin to his being deposited in the coffin, did not exceed three minutes.

Thus fell, to the astonishment of all Europe, Admiral John Byng; who, whatever his errors and indiscretions might have been, was at least rashly condemned, meanly given up, and cruelly sacrificed to vile political intrigues. – The Newgate Calendar, 1780 edition

A school of thought does exist that the empire reaped from its rash, mean, and cruel example a generation of aggressive captains and commodores — or, as Voltaire put it shortly afterwards in Candide, “it is thought good to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.” (“pour encourager les autres”)

It is true that the effect on the Royal Navy was electric. It led captains and admirals to understand that it was no longer enough to blindly follow orders to the letter, but to execute the spirit implicit in the orders as well. It gave the Admiralty carte blanche to instruct officers to carry out a mission without necessarily giving step-by-step instructions. This was important when a ship’s captain might find himself months away from Britain and faced with a situation requiring immediate action. An entire generation of naval officers developed the principles of ‘manoeuvre warfare’ at sea, acting decisively and immediately to take advantage of any opportunity that presented itself. Concurrent with the free hand they had been given, it was also understood that the price of not doing enough was severe.

It also had an effect on Britain’s seafaring rivals. Royal Navy ships would attack an enemy on sight and press home the attack with the desperation of men who knew they could not afford to fail. Faced with a British ship, an enemy commander knew he was going to be attacked and he also knew he was likely to be beaten. Thus the Royal Navy developed a psychological ascendancy over its enemies in the latter half of the 18th Century. Little wonder that the greatest exponent of aggressive naval warfare, Admiral Lord Nelson approached the combined Spanish and French fleets at Trafalgar on the 21 October, 1805 confident of victory. When he famously signalled ‘England expects every man to do his duty’, he did so knowing this was backed with the threat of ignominious execution, not only for the men in his fleet, but also for himself.

Perhaps due in part to the morale effects of Byng’s execution, the British soon rallied from their early setbacks in the Seven Years’ War and emerged from the conflict undisputed masters of North America and India.

And they even got Minorca back, too.

Courtesy of the BBC and Executed Today.
Image: Admiral John Byng, Admiral of the Blue by Thomas Hudson (1749)

Note: I’ve found a much more in depth account of the battle Byng took part in as well as his court martial and execution, but it’s longer of course. Would anyone be interested in reading it? I could post it as a followup. Please let me know!

Dr. Maturin suggests further reading

Recently Entered in the Log

  • master-and-commander-the-far-side-of-the-world
  • Nelson
  • wood _texture1584
  • banks copy
  • (c) National Maritime Museum; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation
  • lthickscoat19
  • desolation
  • tippoo

4 Comments on The Execution of Admiral Byng

  1. subrookie // July 31, 2010 at 10:09 am //

    It seems you could do a whole entry just on the Articles of War. JA speaks of the often in the book series. Your post led me to the Wikipedia entry on them, which is relatively short. Apparently, in response to the execution of Byng they were amended since within the service and around England the thinking was that the punishment did not fit the crime.

    It is interesting that you say this, ” It led captains and admirals to understand that it was no longer enough to blindly follow orders to the letter, but to execute the spirit implicit in the orders as well.” But, in The Ionian Mission Jack asks for detailed, written instructions so that he does not end up getting accused of neglection of duty, or failure to follow the orders of the Admiral who’s wife Jack had an affair with in the first book.

  2. subrookie // July 31, 2010 at 10:11 am //

    And, I guess you already have. I just didn’t see it in the archive list :)

  3. The Dear Knows // August 2, 2010 at 2:50 am //

    I don’t really have an article on the Articles of War, just the full text of them… There is an article on punishment, but it’s not quite the same thing. Perhaps I should research and write an article on them since the Wikipedia entry is so short!

    I would like to point out that *I* didn’t say anything since I didn’t write this article; the section you quote is from the BBC while most of the rest of the article is from Executed Today (what a morbid site). Don’t want anyone to think I’m trying to take credit for work that isn’t mine :)

    Do you think an article about the Articles of War is a good idea? I’m really interested in doing it now…

  4. Subrookie // August 2, 2010 at 1:19 pm //

    I did find a better write up of the history of the Articles of War here: http://www.pdavis.nl/NDA.htm

    There also is an interesting book I stumbled across called “Crime and Punishment in the Royal Navy of the Seven Years War” that has a chapter on the development of naval law in the Royal Navy. I just browsed the few pages online. But, would like to find out more.

    You could earn some infamy and update the Wikipedia page if you chose to take on the topic.

1 Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. 1066 and All That | Journey of a Blogvelist

Comments are closed.